An Inline Comment was posted on the text below
Scroll down for the comments
P.19 In order to have e-democracy properly designed, besides respecting and implementing fundamental freedoms, human and minority rights, including in particular the freedom of and access to information, the following concepts have to be implemented:- comprehensive and active information - aiming at providing the public with balanced and objective information to assist them in understanding problems, alternatives, opportunities and/or solutions of democratic issues, which is closely linked to freedom of information and freedom of speech;- a broad understanding of citizenship - encompassing persons permanently residing and integrated within the boundaries of a political entity, irrespective of their nationality;- citizens’ participation - i.e. the involvement of citizens in public matters, with the purpose of exerting influence and improving the quality and acceptability of the results of democratic processes;- empowerment - policies and measures in support of rights and resources forparticipation;- inclusion - i.e. the political and technological empowerment of citizens irrespective of their age, gender, education, language, special needs and residence into e-democracy, consisting of the ability to use - knowledge, access, e-skills, e-readiness - and of the availability and accessibility of e-tools.
- deliberation - i.e. is a rationality-driven debate amongst equals , where citizenspublicly discuss, validate and criticise each other’s points of view by conducting a reflective, respectful discussion, in respect of an issue and possible action to solve a problem.
I do not agree that deliberation always “has” to be implemented.
So every e-petition also “has” to implement deliberation spaces? The same for e-voting in elections? For a proper deliberation (as described in the text) this is, to some extent, even unfeasible.
Even though I am very much in favour of deliberation, it is more suitable in some cases than in others. The inexistence of formal/structured spheres of deliberation does not mean that citizens are unable, for instance, to inform their votes.
I would remove deliberation from this list and put it in another paragraph.
Maybe right after P.19 a new paragraph stating the following principle:
“Whenever pertinent, deliberation must be implemented. Deliberation here is understood as a rationality-driven debate amongst equals, where citizens publicly discuss, validate and criticize each other’s points of view by conducting a reflective, respectful discussion, in respect of an issue and possible action to solve a problem.”